Automating the Organization and Accessibility of Academic Literature: Bookends and Devonthink Pro

I wrote about Sense-making of the Academic Literature back when I was using Papers. My old workflow required Keyboard Maestro to extract abstract information to Tinderbox. Although Tinderbox is great for visually organizing your notes, it can’t compare to the search capabilities of DevonThink Pro.Since switching to Bookends, I’ve found myself spending less time in Tinderbox and even more time in Devonthink. I’ve made heavy use of a particular built-in Devonthink Template that automates the migration of abstracts from Bookends to DTP (with a link back to Bookends). Once imported into DTP, these abstracts can be parsed using smart folders (enduring searches) that make your literature library a dynamic resource for writing.I have a single DTP database that has indexed the various folders critical in my writing process (e.g. PDFs, extracted notes). In DTP, I’ve organized these folders into a “zz-Inputs Folder”. As you can see below, a sub-folders of zz-Inputs is an “Abstracts Inbox.” When I set up this folder in DTP, I made sure the folder WAS NOT excluded from tagging (this is done by option-clicking on the folder and making sure “exclude from tagging is UNCHECKED).When it’s time to transfer abstracts from Bookends, I first click to select the Abstracts Inbox folder in DTP.I then open up Bookends and sort the fields by the “Added” Column. I like reverse chronological order so I can see the last date I imported abstracts. I highlight all the new manuscripts in Bookends.I then move over to DTP and select the Data:New From Template: Education: Reference (from Bookends) menu item. DTP grabs all the highlighted abstracts from Bookends.The imported information includes Author, Title, Year, Abstract, and Keywords. The template also includes a link back to the publication in Bookends. Finally, there is a field for me to add my own comments to the new DTP file.Once the abstracts are imported into DTP, I make sure to index the folder so the new information is included in search. Now that the information is in DTP I am able to take full advantage of its search functionality and artificial intelligence.I make extensive use of Smart Searches in DTP. Using Smart Searches, The abstracts are automatically sorted into folders.For most topics I have two Smart Searches:

1. as shown below that includes the search criteria AND searching for the tag “Abstracts Inbox” we talked about earlier—this finds only abstracts relevant to the search,

2. only the search criteria—this returns ALL information in the database (including abstracts, PDFs, and extracted text as described in this entry).

In DTP, I bring up the Search Interface (Tools: Search….) and type in my search criteria. By default, in the Search Interface, DTP will search across all databases. Notice on the left hand side I have limited the search to my Writing Database. This returns ALL matching information ONLY in my Writing Database. I’ve color coded information extracted from articles using Highlights (for instance, a blue highlight is a direct quote). I can further limit the search by clicking on the “Advanced…” Button and adding additional criteria (e.g. tags, file types, words such as “blue,” etc.).Once I’ve found an abstract that interests me, I locate semantically similar information by highlighting the abstract in DTP and then clicking on the “See Also” button (the Magic Hat).Using this method, all the information I’ve collected (both read and unread) is easily accessible. I use this method extensively when writing. Please let me know if you find it useful too.

Deckset: Rapid Presentation Generation using MarkDown

My workflows have changed since I wrote my entry: “Why I Use Plaintext” in June 2012. The entry was about avoiding the distraction of Microsoft Word and Apple Pages while writing. At the time I wrote the entry there was no Ulysses. Now I use Ulysses for almost all my short-form writing. In 2012, there was no iOS version of Scrivener. Now I use Scrivener for all my long-form writing. Although technology has changed, some things have not. I still dislike bloated software packages that get in the way of my final goal. I still love Plaintext / Markdown.There is another requirement of my job that relies just as heavily on bloated software-presentations. Speeding up the development of a presentation is the focus of this entry.Presentations are used throughout business and academia to transmit ideas. Some influential thinkers, such as Edward Tufte, argue bulleted presentations shouldn’t be used at all. The reality is that presentations are deeply ingrained in business and academia. Many presenters rely too heavily on the glitz offered by the software at the expense of content. It’s easy to get lost in software features—spending hours tweaking backgrounds, transitions, and text placement.Which brings me to Deckset. Deckset is an amazing application for iOS that converts Markdown files into presentations. As this review of Deckset 1 in Macworld says: “It’s designed for the average person who needs to make beautiful slides without the muss and fuss of Keynote or PowerPoint.” With the release of Deckset 2 and its outstanding features, the application has become my go-to application for rapid preparation of presentations. Because Deckset uses Markdown, I find myself concentrating less on making my slides look attractive and more on content. Deckset works seamlessly with Ulysses, allowing me to quickly edit my presentations on my phone, my tablet, or my Mac. (You can use any text editor with Deckset. If you plan to use Ulysses, check out these helpful tips).I recently used Deckset to develop a new 30 minute presentation. I estimate the presentation took about 1/4 the amount of time to develop versus Keynote. The cost for Deckset 2 is $29 (with educational discounts available).Here is a link to the Deckset manual.

Bookends Adds Floating Citation Window

I’d like to bring the latest update of BookEnds to your attention.This update fixed an error that would crash the Bookends when trying to obtain a reference (or link back to a reference in Bookends using a DOI link) from Highlights.app. The latest update fixes this error. Clicking on the reference link in Highlights now selects the reference in Bookends without having to modify the Highlights markdown file. This obviates the need to modify the Highlights markdown file as mentioned  in this entry.The latest update also added a floating citation window to Bookends. Like Papers, the floating citation window is invoked using customizable key combinations. So far, I’ve cited using the floating window in Scrivener, Ulysses, and Highlights.app. It works flawlessly.Well done Jon and Sonny Software!

Reading, extracting and storing scholarly information to supercharge the writing process

Bookends has completely replaced Papers.app as my citation manager. Despite this change, my method of information gathering has changed little since I covered the topic, except for one major addition. I am now finding the majority of information through qxMD Read.My workflow for extraction of annotations differs a bit from when I was using Papers. I now use the combination of Bookends and Highlights.app to extract each of my annotations and notes as separate files. In addition, after highlighting, I’ve been extracting the entire manuscripts in 1-4 paragraph pieces.The whole purpose of extracting annotations and full text from each manuscript is to gain granular access to the information I’ve read. Through its "see also" feature, Devonthink can identify information I’m looking for. But more importantly Devonthink finds related content based on the context of my original query.After importing a manuscript into Bookends, the document becomes available on all my devices. Bookends outshines Papers in its built-in annotation tools as well as its seamless syncing between iOS and Mac.

My current preference is reading PDFs on a 12.9" iPad Pro along with an Apple Pencil. In a pinch, I’ll annotate on my iPhone. On my first pass through an article, using Bookend's built-in tools, I highlight annotations and jot notes in green. I use blue to highlight quotes I wish to use verbatim. When I’m finished annotating, I add the keyword RFP (ready for processing) to the manuscript in the Bookend database.

I have a Smart Folder set up in Bookends that finds the Keyword RFP. Uzsing this method, I can batch process multiple PDFs when I get to my Mac.When I'm ready to extract the information from the PDF into my Devonthink writing database, I export the PDF to my desktop and append the exported file’s name with FT (for fulltext).On my desktop, I open the file with Highlights. I use Copy Hypertext Link:Copy as Text from Bookends, and then open the “Edit” Tab in Highlights. Using use the text URL copied from Bookends to make a markdown link back to the Bookends Reference.When I export my annotations to Devonthink, the URL link will be appended to each file. Clicking the link within any extracted file takes me directly back to the reference in Bookends.I then turn my attention to Highlights.app. I make sure the annotations color preference is checked in Highlights.app. When checked, this preference will append the color of the highlight in each note.

Within Highlights, I use yellow to mark up the entire document over the top of my previous annotations. I highlight in 1-4 paragraph chunks. I also highlight the text of each table and figure.Once I'm done highlighting the entire paper, from within Highlights.app, I export my annotations to Devonthink from the Highlights.app menu. The annotations are saved as individual files to my Devonthink Inbox. I move the folder from the Devonthink Inbox to my desktop and then use Launchbar to move file from my desktop to my annotations folder. I put the desktop PDF in the trash, replace the RFP keyword in Bookends with DTx to remind me I've extracted the paper.

Since I’ve set up my Devonthink database to index this folder,the next time I launch Devonthink, the new information is catalogued and available for writing. The new information is also transferred to Devonthink ToGo to use while writing on my iPad.Using the Artificial Intelligence of Devonthink. I can quickly find related information. When I find an item in my database I want to include in my paper, clicking the link in the annotation takes me directly to the paper in Bookends.app.Using this method, I'm able to take full advantage of the Devonthink AI. Queries within Devonthink simultaneously find annotations, chunks of text and full manuscripts related to my search. I find this workflow invaluable when writing scholarly information.

***This workflow has been modified from here to the end-Please see Modification to Reading, Extracting And Storing Scholarly Information To Supercharge The Writing Process to see what I do instead.***

Keeping Current with Bookends and QxMD Read

In a previous entry, I covered the ways I add new literature to my scholarly manuscript collection. Technology has evolved since that entry. I’ve migrated to Bookends to keep my literature organized, and I have additional ways I find new literature I’d like to read. That’s what I’d like to cover today.In my MacWorld entry (circa 2012), I mentioned the three ways I collected new reading material:

• as a recipient of an Endnote library (when writing collaboratively)

• through personal searches on the web (and liberal use of Google’s automated search terms)

• as attachments to colleague’s emails

Since then, there are two methods I use even more commonly:

• Following individuals with similar interests and using keywords in Twitter.

• Using QxMD Read

Until recently, I was not familiar with QxMD Read. A colleague at Duke, Dr. Jordan Komisarow, brought the app to my attention. According to QxMD, Read “provides a single place to keep up with new medical & scientific research, read outstanding topic reviews and search PubMed. This iPhone & iPad app provides a simple interface that drives discovery and seamless access to the medical literature by reformatting it into a personalized digital journal.” One comment describes the app as “The Flipboard of Medical Literature.”The app was easy to set up. First I made a QxMD username and password. Then I chose my professions of interest. Finally, I chose specific journals, keywords, and collated collections.Once set up, Read began scouring the medical literature for new articles.In a single screen, I scroll through all the new publications (titles, conclusion, journal, etc.).If I find something of interest, I click on the title to find more information, including the entire abstract. While I’m scanning the abstract, Read attempts to download the full-text PDF.About half the time, Read finds a PDF and downloads it into the app. If the PDF cannot be found, I email the entry to my personalized Omnifocus Mail Drop so the paper is added to my Omnifocus Inbox.If the PDF is downloaded into Read, it is then a simple task to move the document into Bookends. The ease of importing full entries is one of the many places Bookends outshines Papers. I click Open In… and then select the Bookends icon.Bookends works its magic, finding one (or sometimes more) suggestions as matches.I choose the matching metadata and Bookends imports the PDF and metadata into its database. The paper and its metadata are immediately available on all of my devices.The process works pretty seamlessly. The only annoyance is that if you save the PDF to your library, it receives a numerical name. You must later open Bookends on your Mac and rename the PDF to your naming convention. This is a small price to pay for such power.I'm finding even more relevant information these days using QxMD Read. My challenge now is finding the time to read and process it all!

My Migration from Papers to Bookends

I have dedicated a lot of time and energy squeaking every ounce of productivity from the Papers app. I’ve used Papers for more than a decade. Over the years, I built many scripts and work-arounds to address the shortcomings of the application.ReadCube purchased Papers in 2016. Because of the time I’ve spent in Papers, I started having angst when I read of certain changes to the software: a subscription model, the loss of Magic Citations, and the loss of integration with Scrivener.I started exploring alternatives to Papers. When I wrote about my interest in migrating away from Papers, several Wippp Readers suggested I check out Bookends. Several folks raved about the tight integration between Bookends and Devonthink as well as Bookends and Tinderbox—two other programs I use heavily in my academic life. Several people also mentioned the LEGENDARY support of SonnySoft, the company  behind Bookends.My initial evaluation of Bookends was far too cursory. Following publication of the blog entry, I received a very nice email from SonnySoft asking me to take a closer look at Bookends. After digging deep into the software, I decided to migrate from Papers to Bookends. I haven’t looked back. It’s been several months now and the more I use Bookends, the more I like it.Things I like about Bookends:

• The interface, although not as modern as Papers, is cleaner and more organized.

• The iOS and Desktop version are better integrated than Papers.

• A PDF on my phone is drop-dead easy to import into Bookends. The PDF and the metadata I choose is automatically synced with the Mac app (although I have to rename the pdf when I get to my Mac).

• All PDFs are saved to a single folder in iCloud, making them easy to access and for Devonthink to index.

• Bookends integrates well with Scrivener (and many other writing clients)

• Dragging and dropping citations into Tinderbox and Devonthink are both seamless. Tinderbox maintains metadata from Bookends. This obviates the need for the KM script I built to move citations from Papers to Tinderbox.

Things I don’t like:

• It was difficult to import Papers library with PDF into Bookends (Bookends only imported about 1/3 of my PDFs).

• I can't export or customize the format of the exported metadata.

• My smart collections don’t transfer to iOS.

• Although I can designate a “watch” folder to import new PDFs into Bookends, this only works with PDFs that are saved to the folder AFTER Bookends is open. This didn't work well with how I collect information so I decided to modify my Hazel script, changing it to launch Bookends instead of Papers.

• I don't like the way duplicate references and / or PDFs are handled.

Over the next few months, I plan to write several entries about my migration and how Bookends has become a critical part of my augmented writing workflow.

Papers 3 now supports Scrivener 3!

I had a pleasant surprise today. I opened up Papers to find an update. The update includes support of Magic Citations in Scrivener 3. Thank you ReadCube!

Highlighting PDFs from Within Scrivener

Here is a quick trick to use with Scrivener.I’ve been working on some short executive summaries. For longer projects I tend to keep my research in Devonthink. For these shorter reports, I’ve been importing all the supporting information into Scrivener. On several occasions, I’ve wanted to highlight PDFs within Scrivener.It’s very easy to do. In Scrivener, just click on the button indicated in the picture to launch the imported PDF in your default reader.Holding the button down lets you select a different PDF Reader (and lets you choose to make it your default application). Any highlighting changes are saved back to the PDF in Scrivener. I've used this trick numerous times over the past few weeks. I hope you find it useful too.

ReadCube Release of Papers App

If you’ve read my blog, you know I’m invested in Papers. The majority of my writing workflows use the app.I’ve been following news about the app with trepidation. Papers “teamed up” with RedCube in March of 2016. Readcube / Papers have been working on a new version of the app. Although the screenshots look reminiscent of Papers, there will be at least one major change; Papers is moving to a subscription model. I have not found pricing information yet.The combination of a new version, and unknown pricing model, and a distrust of traditional publishers has left me wanting to explore my options.I’m curious what app each of you is currently using for manuscript management and bibliography generation (and why). Please leave comments below.Addendum: Beware. Updating to Scrivener 3 breaks Magic Citations in Papers. From what I've read online, Readcube is not saying when (or if) this issue will be resolved.

OmniFocus Mail Drop Trick

Here's a quick tip for getting tasks from your email to your OmniFocus Inbox.Many times, requests for my time arrive via email. Committing and tracking this type of request used to be a multi-step process. First, I'd add the email to my OmniFocus Inbox. Then I would reply to the email acknowledging my commitment (or requesting a follow-up).I realized there was an easier way....Now, when replying to an email with a task, I merely put my OmniFocus Mail Drop email address in the bcc field. Using this method, I can respond and track the task in a single button click.

Travel Receipt Workflow

Here is a handy workflow to keep track of your reimbursable / billable expenses on the road.Set-up:

• Evernote Premium
• Evernote Scannable
• If This Then That

I have an Evernote Notebook that is used solely for professional receipts. This notebook is named “Receipts_Work”. I’ve set up an If This Then That (IFTTT) Applet to send an email when the notebook receives a new note.When I receive a receipt on the road, I immediately scan it with Scannable then save it to my Receipts_Work Notebook. IFTTT monitors the Receipts_Work Notebook. When the new note is detected, it automatically sends an email to both my assistant and my Omnifocus Maildrop address (so the item is added to my Omnifocus Inbox).After my trip, I can go back to my Evernote, select all the receipts/notes from my trip and make a “Table of Contents” using a single button push in Evernote.This workflow simplifies management of reimbursement receipts. Hope it works as well for you as it does for me.

Highlights.app Redux

I was too quick to judge the program Highlights. I gave Highlights a second chance, and although not perfect, the app is slowly winning me over. Highlights has greatly sped up the extraction of information from my reading.First a little background. I use Papers for my PDF and bibliographic management. I’ve written about how I extract highlights and annotations into individual files along with their relevant references. The reason to go to this trouble is to enable Devonthink’s artificial intelligence. The Devonthink AI uses word count to find related information in other files. I use this method extensively in my writing of grants and manuscripts. With my previous method, I found by adding references to each annotation (thus similar words) I was interfering with Devonthink’s ability to find relevant information. In order to improve Devonthink’s accuracy, I stopped adding references to each individual annotation. Instead, I merely include a Papers Link back to the original file.Highlights shows the annotations you make in the app's right-hand column. A pop-up interface within Highlights allows you to make comments, underline , change colors, etc. The killer feature of Highlights is single-command extraction of each annotation / comment to its own file. This feature allows me to extract highlights (and metadata) without having to invoke my Keyboard Maestro macros. When the data is extracted into Devonthink, the individual files are in Markdown. This makes the extracted information easy to view and edit.Although I’m more enthusiastic about Highlights, there are several quirks you should understand:

1. When Highlights explodes your annotations into individual files, it prepends the original file’s name. If you use Highlights from within Papers (e.g. selecting Highlights as your PDF reader of choice from within Papers) you will end up with a ridiculous, machine based title in your metadata. This is not Highlights fault. The use of non-intuitive file names is one of my pet peeves about Papers. The workaround is to export a copy of the PDF to your Desktop and then launch the exported file using Highlights. Using this method, the author’s name and the title of the manuscript along with the year of publication are all prepended to each markdown file.

2. After reading and highlighting, I edit the markdown headers in Highlights (choosing the edit tab in the annotations window). I erase all but the primary author’s name and then add the Paper’s Citation and a Papers Link back to original file (copied from Paper’s Edit Menu). There is another quirk here. In Highlights Edit Mode, if you don’t leave a space between the markdown coding and the information you add, your file will be reset back to its original state, erasing your modifications.

3. Highlights has the ability to automatically look up DOI numbers. When it works, it’s great. It takes a single click to import a reference from the bibliography into your Paper’s Database. Unfortunately, this feature is flaky, especially with longer manuscripts. I often have to revert to my Launchbar scripts to capture the bibliographic information I need.

Once I’ve added the metadata I want to the master annotation file (and collected the references of interest), from within Highlights, I choose Export >> Devonthink. Highlights creates individual markdown files for each of the annotations. Each individual file contains the master file’s metadata. The data is copied to my Devonthink Global Inbox. I move the folder from the Devonthink Inbox to my Desktop and from there to my Annotations Folder using Launchbar.Highlights has significantly sped up the time it takes to process a manuscript. Using this method, I’m also having greater success with the “See Also” feature of Devonthink. I hope it works for you too.

Sense-making of Academic Literature using Tinderbox

I began using a program called Tinderbox many years ago. Although I understood the program was very powerful, I never took the time to dig into its many features. Over the last six months I've been incorporating Tinderbox into my Writing and have been extremely impressed at the depth of features and the incredible capabilities it adds to my workflow.Don’t feel badly if you haven’t heard of Tinderbox—It's a bit hard to explain. One might call it a hypertext personal information management tool—but that description really doesn’t do it justice. If you’re interested and would like to orient yourself to what Tinderbox is, try this Macworld review of Tinderbox 5 (the current version is 7).An increasing amount of my time is now spent thinking about the rapidly evolving information on the human microbiome. I have read hundreds of papers in this domain, but, like most academicians, I struggle to keep track of the things I’ve Taken in, and how it connects to past and future information. I decided microbiome information was the perfect use case for Tinderbox and finally bit the bullet. To say I've been impressed would be an understatement.The first step was getting the abstracts and metadata from Papers into Tinderbox. I used Keyboard Maestro to build a script to automate the process. The script uses TextEdit to build a document that includes the title, authors, abstract, Pubmed link, Papers link, and Papers citation.Once the information is assembled in Textedit, the whole note is copied to Tinderbox.I then put together an assortment of agents that search across the entirety of the imported information and aggregate information similar information under a single heading.The result is the ability to rapidly find related Information, in an organized fashion, on virtually any topic I’ve read. As I digest new information, I add the abstract and metadata to my Tinderbox Inbox and the agents do the rest—duplicating the abstract into the relevent topics throughout my outline.I have been using the collection of abstracts as the starting place for writing manuscripts and grants. Tinderbox can export Individual items, or the entire document outline as OPML—making it easy to import into OmniOutliner, or more commonly for me, Scrivener. I’ve found myself starting with Tinderbox, then making queries in Devonthink as the idea evolves.Although it has taken a significant amount of time inputting the abstracts into Tinderbox, I am already reaping rewards. It worked so well with the microbiome, I’m using the same method (and scripts) with each of the major areas of my academic life: simulation, integrative medicine, and the microbiome.Tinderbox has an incredible feature set, but it has a very steep learning curve. That is where the User Forums come in. There is an active and friendly group of Tinderbox experts more than willing to answer even the most basic question. I have found digging through both the new and old forums incredibly useful while learning to use this incredible piece of software.Although I spend the majority of my time in the outline mode, Tinderbox offers the opportunity to visualize information in a variety of different ways including basic maps, tree maps, and a whole host of other methods. These options add many other possibilities,. There are hundreds of features I have not covered in this entry but will in future entries. The program is so feature-rich, I've only begun to wrap my mind around the many ways Tinderbox can be used.A few caveats with my Keyboard Maestro script:

• The item you wish to extract must be highlighted within Papers
• TextEdit must be running.
• Keyboard Maestro is wonky when it comes to adding carriage returns—when typing the metadata I have to manually place carriage returns to separate information. I deliberately put a two second delay between each paste to give me time to press the return key.
• Do not interrupt the macro-interruption may result in data-overwrite or loss.
• The script gets the reference information from Papers—and prepends a “1. “ before the actual reference. This is both a bug and a feature—because of this, the new reference bubbles up to the top of the information (sorted by title name), but has to be manually removed.

Overall I have been incredibly impressed with Tinderbox and wished I had learned more about it years ago. My investment of time is already paying dividends. I’m currently using Tinderbox to draft a manuscript and a grant proposal. I will continue to blog about features as I learn more about the program. Enjoy.

Copied - a game-changing universal clipboard for all of your devices

It is grant season and thus it's been quite some time since I've written an entry. Today I want to talk about the program I'm using quite extensively for writing and social media. The application is Copied. Copied is available both for Mac and iOS. Copied is a universal clipboard application that makes information available on all your devices (with an in-app upgrade). The ubiquitous availability of your clipboard, in my opinion, is priceless.Some of the ways I am using Copied:

1. Capturing screen shots of my iOS devices for blog entries.
2. transferring information from programs such as Drafts to my Mac (without having to use an intermediary program such as Evernote)
3. Capturing information on my computer and transferring to my phone (e.g. addresses, screenshots, etc.)
4. Capturing images from the web—Copied automatically captures the URL of the picture and appends it to the clipboard entry (saving me the time it used to take to copy this information manually).
5. Quickly capturing the titles of references I wish to download after finishing reading a manuscript in Skim.
6. Capturing the references from a manuscript to be added to each of my extracted annotations.

I find a new way to use Copied every week. Copied has features (such as automated scripting templates) that I have yet to explore. Even without these unexplored features, Copied is a powerful addition to my writing toolbox - well worth the price.I’d be interested in hearing how others are utilizing this phenomenal app in their daily work.

Import Evernote into Ulysses

As you can tell from my past posts, I love the app Ulysses. As of this week, Ulysses became even more powerful with the ability to import Evernote files (although not in bulk). Check it out!

LiquidText PDF Reader

I have experimented with different PDF readers on my iPad. Over the past several months I’ve exclusively used a program called LiquidText.LiquidText has a unique, award-winning, interface that allows me to drag, drop, and manipulate text using my finger. LiquidText was named “Most Innovative iPad App of the Year” by Apple in 2015. LiquidText feels much more natural than any other PDF reader I’ve used on iOS--and I've used many. After highlighting with my finger, the exerpts / highlights / comments are extracted into their own area. The excerpts may be dragged around, linked, and repositioned at will.When reading and highlighting, I either drag text from the PDF into the notes area, or simply hit “AutoExcerpt” and the text is extracted for me. I can comment on the excerpted information.I can also view the place in the paper the highlight came from by merely touching the excerpt in the notes area.LiquidText reads and writes to a whole range of cloud services, but has limited range of export document choices.An Enterprise version is available for $9.99 that adds features like multi-document search and the ability to comment on multiple documents simultaneously. I've been using the app so much, I upgraded primarily to support the developer.There are a few features that are not (yet) available—the most critical for me is the inability to export highlights into a text file—LiquidText only exports highlights to Microsoft Word. This, unfortunately, is not compatible with my workflow for extracting highlights, but I like Liquidtext so much, I figured out a workaround using Skim—here is my entire workflow:

• I set up a Dropbox LiquidText Folder to serve as a bridge with my desktop.
• I open the entry in Papers on iOS.
• From within Papers I select "open in". -this brings up action menu.



• I open, read, and annotate in Liquidtext. This includes linking the full-text of references to each excerpt (as suggested by reader GH).
• I export the PDF and Notes from Liquidtext to my Dropbox Folder.



• When I get to my Mac, I open the PDF in Skim.
• Under the File Menu in Skim, I choose “Convert Notes” making my highlights into Skim Notes.
• I then process the annotations as discussed in this blog entry.
• (If you want to take the time on your desktop you can also replace the Papers PDF with the LiquidText highlighted version).

Give Liquidtext a try and please let me know what you think.

Skim Split Screen Workaround

When reading PDFs on my Mac, I use Skim. Although I love the program, Skim has one annoying quirk. I cannot select (or highlight) text in a split screen. This makes it difficult to highlight or download references in real-time.I found a workaround that is fast and efficient. After opening a PDF in Skim, I’ll select “Print” from the File Menu and then, from the bottom left drop down menu, I’ll select “Open PDF in Preview.” This opens a second editable version of the manuscript side-by-side with the original.Let me know how this works for you.

Airmail 3 - A Unified email Experience to Rule Them All

Several months ago I wrote about my discovery of Spark email. I wrote about what I like and disliked in the app. Although Spark wasn’t perfect, I preferred it to the built-in iOS Mail app. I used Spark exclusively on iOS for a month.But then, a reader wrote and told me I should check out Airmail by Bloop. I had tried an earlier version of Airmail, but was less than impressed. Regardless, I decided to check out what had changed in the latest version.When I read the updated features of Airmail along with the promise of a simplified unified experience across all devices, I decided to give it a try. I’m glad I did—I’ve used Airmail exclusively as my email client since mid-July.From the Airmail website:

Airmail 3 is a new mail client designed for El Capitan with fast performance and intuitive interaction. Support for iCloud™, MS Exchange, Gmail™, Google™ Apps, IMAP, POP3, Yahoo!™, AOL™, Outlook.com™, Live.com™Airmail was designed from the ground to retain the same experience with a single or multiple accounts and provide a quick, modern and easy-to-use user experience. Airmail is clean and allows you to get to your emails without interruption - it’s the mail client for the 21st century.

Beside the unified experience, I particularly appreciate the ability to customize every aspect of the email experience.In addition, Airmail supports services (the actions I use most commonly include saving attachments to Evernote or moving an email to an Omnifocus task).There are 4 customizable swipes. I  chose to customize this feature in the following manner:

1. short left swipe-DELETE email
2. long left swipe-bring up action menu
3. short right swipe-Archive
4. long right swipe-Snooze (message disappears to re-appear at a future time).

Another nice perk is the ability to synchronize accounts and settings using iCloud. This feature alone saved me tons of time when setting the app up on my Mac, iPhone, and iPad.I’ve been incredibly happy with Airmail over the past several months and don’t anticipate this changing. I hope you’ll give Airmail a try.